Sheldon logo SHELDON
Media

Abridged report · Space-enabling infrastructure

Federal award data through Oct 22, 2026

Space Ground and Link Infrastructure

Satellites cannot operate without ground stations, control networks, and communications links on Earth. A 2024 Military Review article by Maj. Brian Hamel calls this space-enabling infrastructure and argues that it is where space competition is decided. To see how the United States funds it, SHELDON traced federal funding for space ground and link infrastructure from FY2015 through FY2026.

Space ground and link infrastructure covers the systems that control and communicate with satellites from the ground: satellite control networks, ground stations, military satellite communications terminals, and the networks NASA uses to track and communicate with its spacecraft.

This abridged report provides a glimpse into our findings, highlighting who funds this work, who performs it, how competitive each part of the market is, and more.

For more information, contact Amanda Bresler, abresler@pwcommunications.com

Space Ground and Link Infrastructure, FY2015-FY2026

$12.03B
federal obligations, FY2015-FY2026
1.9x
growth in average annual funding, FY2015-FY2017 compared to FY2024-FY2026
977
entities received funding for space ground and link work, FY2015-FY2026
52%
of funding came from the Department of the Air Force, FY2015-FY2026

Funding by year

Annual funding has nearly doubled since FY2015

Federal funding for space ground and link infrastructure rose from $667 million in FY2015 to $1.30 billion in FY2025 and $1.29 billion in FY2026. The Department of the Air Force accounts for most of the increase. Its funding grew from $237 million in FY2015 to $932 million in FY2026, the highest level in the period.

Federal funding for space ground and link infrastructure, by fiscal year

$0 $200M $400M $600M $800M $1.0B $1.2B $1.4B FY15 $667M FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 $1.33B FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 $1.30B FY26
Show the numbers
Fiscal yearObligatedAward actions
FY2015$667,456,4201,376
FY2016$539,824,3661,532
FY2017$706,405,943702
FY2018$839,231,1311,047
FY2019$1,249,528,414621
FY2020$1,333,541,274728
FY2021$1,115,119,309744
FY2022$896,292,572672
FY2023$1,045,022,976665
FY2024$1,049,740,379666
FY2025$1,301,761,0321,787
FY2026$1,287,113,0221,245

Who receives the funding

Five companies receive nearly two-thirds of the funding

Of the $12.03 billion obligated since FY2015, the top five companies receive 64% and the top ten receive 77%. Peraton alone receives 27%, mostly to operate NASA's space communications and navigation networks.

Top 10 recipients, share of total funding

Peraton Inc.
$3.27B
The Boeing Company
$1.42B
General Dynamics Mission Systems Inc
$1.37B
Lockheed Martin Corp
$996M
Raytheon Company
$666M
LinQuest Corporation
$479M
CACI NSS LLC
$353M
Advanced Technology International
$256M
General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.
$247M
Global Enterprise Solutions Inc
$175M

Small businesses are more than half the field and 8% of the dollars

More than half of the entities doing this work are small businesses, but together they receive about 8% of the funding. Another 74 companies were small when they received funding in this field and have since grown past small-business size.

Small businesses, share of entities548 of 977 · 56.1%
Small businesses, share of funding$984.0M of $12.03B · 8.2%

Who provides the funding

The Air Force provides more than half of the funding

The Department of the Air Force, which includes the Space Force, provides $6.24 billion, or 52% of the total. NASA is second at $2.99 billion. Navy funding has declined, from a high of $259 million in FY2022 to $30 million in FY2026.

Funding by agency, FY2015-FY2026, top six

Department of the Air Force
$6.24B
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
$2.99B
Department of the Navy
$1.47B
Department of the Army
$416M
Defense Information Systems Agency
$222M
U.S. Special Operations Command
$173M

Types of work

Competition varies widely by type of work

SHELDON grouped awards by type of work, based on each award's description. Boeing receives all of the funding for the Protected Tactical Enterprise Service, and Peraton receives 67% of NASA network funding. Funding for protected satellite terminals, the Air Force Satellite Control Network, and MUOS ground system labor is spread more widely, with no single company receiving more than a third.

Funding by type of work, FY2015-FY2026

fragmentedtop company receives a third or less concentratedtop company receives 34 to 60% monopolizedtop company receives more than 60%
NASA space communications and navigation networksmonopolized
$2.24B
Protected satellite communications terminals (AEHF, FAB-T)fragmented
$1.56B
Air Force Satellite Control Network operations and modificationfragmented
$1.31B
MUOS ground system sustainmentconcentrated
$1.31B
Military satellite communications systems engineering supportconcentrated
$1.06B
MUOS ground system labor and enhancementsfragmented
$995M
Protected Tactical Enterprise Service (PTES)monopolized
$547M
Enhanced Mobile Satellite Service (EMSS) equipment and serviceconcentrated
$33.6M

$2.98 billion in awards could not be assigned to a single type of work and is not shown.

From subcontractor to prime

Space command and control drove a fivefold jump in Phase III funding

SBIR Phase III awards represent work initiated under the Small Business Innovation Research program that transitioned into operational use, using non-SBIR funding. Phase III funding in this field rose from $24 million in FY2025 to $125 million in FY2026. Two Space Systems Command awards for space command and control account for nearly all of it: $101 million to Modern Technology Solutions and $23 million to Omitron.

SHELDON's data shows that Modern Technology Solutions first entered this field as a subcontractor. By tracing its award records, we can see how it moved into prime contracts.

Modern Technology Solutions: federal funding in this field, FY2019-FY2026

  1. FY2019$5.9M as a subcontractor to LinQuest on military satellite communications systems engineering
  2. FY2021-23Continued subcontract work for LinQuest and Tecolote Research on MILSATCOM and MUOS programs
  3. FY2023First prime contract: MUOS systems engineering support, $58M through FY2026
  4. FY2025-26$115M Phase III award to prototype space command and control processes for Space Systems Command. $173M in total as a prime.

Geography

California, Virginia, and Maryland account for more than half of the work

Federal contracts record where work is performed. By that measure, California accounts for 26% of space ground and link funding, followed by Virginia (18%), Maryland (11%), Colorado (10%), and Arizona (9%). California, Virginia, and Maryland are also home to the most companies doing this work.

Under $10M $10M-$100M $100M-$500M $500M-$1B $1B or more None recorded

Use the buttons or pinch to zoom, and drag to move. Hover over a state or dot for details. Organizations are shown at their registered addresses (934 of 977).

Top states by funding performed, FY2015-FY2026

California
$3.10B
Virginia
$2.10B
Maryland
$1.37B
Colorado
$1.24B
Arizona
$1.05B
Florida
$784.3M
Massachusetts
$630.7M
New York
$434.8M

Shares are of the $11.96 billion with a recorded place of performance.

Commercial buying

Most contract dollars are not bought as commercial items

Contracting officers record whether each purchase used commercial-item procedures (FAR Part 12). In this field, more than half of contract actions used commercial procedures, but those actions account for only 10% of contract dollars. Commercial procedures are common on smaller purchases and rare on large ones.

55%
of contract actions used commercial procedures, FY2015-Present
10%
of contract dollars went through those actions, FY2015-Present
87%
of contract dollars were bought without commercial procedures, FY2015-Present

Sources and method

  • Sources: federal contracts (FPDS), grants and other assistance (USAspending), SBIR/STTR, and DTIC research records, plus sub-award data.
  • An award is included when its description references space ground and link infrastructure work. Program-wide awards that cover both satellites and ground systems, such as AEHF, MUOS, and WGS, are counted in full. Awards only for launch services or satellite development are excluded.
  • Awards recorded in more than one system are counted once. Sub-award dollars are excluded from totals because they are already part of the prime award.

About SHELDON

SHELDON has aggregated hundreds of publicly available government and government-adjacent datasets, cleaned and unified them so they function as a mirror of the federal government and all the entities it works with, at the prime and subtier levels. This dataset serves as a clearinghouse for answering questions and solving problems for government partners. SHELDON also has a software component that supports data visualization, intelligence aggregation, and portfolio analysis.

The full report includes company profiles, award-level detail, and geographic analysis. Visit sheldon-insights.com or contact Amanda Bresler, abresler@pwcommunications.com.

Prepared by SHELDON Insights from public federal award records, FY2015-FY2026, data through October 22, 2026. Figures are obligations: funds the government has legally committed.